Thursday, January 04, 2007

911-12 New Year.. times are a changing.... No more new posts

Other than for my personal Blog “Saysame,” I will not be adding any more posts to any of my “other” Blogs. The original intent and purpose of those Blogs was to present and document the unloving denials present in our society and so show how the different religions, governments, organizations, customs and traditions are all related and how the truth is distorted, manipulated and controlled by denial, omission, or in stating part truths meant to confuse and deceive. In all our history, nothing has really changed except the form of the experiences and no real healing or true understanding can take place as long as these conditions, fueled by unlovingness and old imprints, programs and beliefs are present.

What is happening globally now is merely the lull before the storm, a momentary pause in the on-going and escalating hatred and violence, creating the illusion of a possible peace, but that is only a façade. Rest assured that each side with its religion, government and its social structure and order is silently preparing for either a new offensive or defensive maneuver. Nothing has changed except, as mentioned, the “form” of the experience and now a "new" element will be brought into the conflicts to create the appearance that this is a new and different problem and issue and so the cycle continues, going around and around as it also escalates.

The coming times and Earth changes will not be easy as it will bring a total breakdown of society as we presently know it. These changes will not be affecting some other person or people in another part of the world, but will be happening on our personal doorstep where it can’t be denied unless denial is still your intent.

In the next few years everyone will be facing their denials and will be making life and death choices that will have far reaching consequences; more than just our present physical survival, but the survival of our very Spiritual essence. For Humanity to survive, we need to change within, before we can change the without. We need to let go of all our old imprints, programs and beliefs that keep us in this never ending cycle of unlovingness, suffering and death created by denial, guilt and shame that we have been struggling to change and call life. We can’t change it. IT is what it is…. until IT wants to change. What we need to do is to let it go from within us and to allow it to find it’s right place. Those that desire and choose to continue to follow IT need to be allowed to do so to also find their right place.


Sunday, November 19, 2006

911-11 Link between 911 toxic air and lung deaths dismissed

9/11 autopsy guidelines plan abandoned
NEW YORK - An effort to create standard autopsy guidelines that could document a link between toxic air at ground zero and deaths of 9/11 rescue workers has been abandoned by the federal government amid concerns the information collected could be misinterpreted.

The National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, in a note posted Friday on its Web site, said the agency "instead will pursue other avenues for documenting long-term health effects from exposure to air contaminants from the World Trade Center disaster.".... Outside medical experts who reviewed the plan suggested focusing on monitoring epidemiological patterns of disease in those exposed.

In a Sept. 15 draft, the institute proposed examining specific sections of the lungs and creating a "tissue bank" to preserve certain organs and bodily fluids for later testing...... The institute said reviewers had raised several questions, including concerns that "the draft document could be misinterpreted or misapplied, hindering rather than furthering progress in addressing WTC health concerns."

Because autopsy results are often used in civil lawsuits, the results collected by the institute — while intended as a scientific study — could be used as a trial tool for lawyers and others with an "undeniable self-interest" in the cause of death, Prezant said.

Monday, October 02, 2006

911-10 Rice on 9/11 "but what I really don't know, what I'm quite certain of"

'06 Oct 02 Rice: No memory of CIA warning of attack ......
SHANNON, Ireland - Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice said she cannot recall then CIA chief George Tenet warning her of an impending al-Qaida attack in the United States, as a new book claims he did two months before the attacks on Sept. 11, 2001.

"I don't know that this meeting took place, but what I really don't know, what I'm quite certain of, is that it was not a meeting in which I was told there was an impending attack and I refused to respond," Rice said.

Dah????? "but what I really don't know, what I'm quite certain of" ..... That's just so stupid it could be funny....if.... it wasn't coming from a woman in a position of power that she has... now that makes it scary.... Either Rice is ignorant... and if that's the case, what's she doing in the position she's in? Or... she's pretending to be ignorant, in which case, what's she covering up?

Time for some political shit to hit the old proverbial fan...

A second version of Interview.... Rice: I don't recall alert about attack


'06 Oct 03 >>State Dept. confirms Rice-Tenet meeting>>>
IDDAH, Saudi Arabia - Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice did receive a CIA briefing about terror threats just about two months before the Sept. 11 attacks, but the information was not new, her chief spokesman said.

Wednesday, June 07, 2006

911-9 Cover Up Links

Hi again,

I'm not going to go any further with this blog except to continue to add links to other blogs and sites that I stumble upon in my travels. There are literally thousands of sites out there that are far more detailed and in-depth than I could ever be or want to be. My purpose for this site is to simply raise conscious awareness that events and issues that change our lives are not always what they appear to be. My intent is to give you some "food for thought" along with a piece of the puzzle, and it's what you do with it that's important to you. Just as in the movie "The Matrix" you have a choice. I don't remember the exact words but it went something like, "take the red pill and see how deep the rabbit hole goes, or take the blue pill and forget everything that you've seen and heard"

If you have a site or know of one that you feel I would be interested and could add to this site, drop me an e-mail.


Here is the beginning of 911 Cover-Up sites;


911 TopSites List

Jeff Rense Program

Prisioner Planet

The Secret Activist

9/11 conspiracy theorists thriving '06 Aug 06

911 SCRUB Viewing Room

9/11 Truth: Unusual Evacuations

Archive of Rare 9/11 Interviews

Tuesday, May 16, 2006

911-8 2006 May 16 Pentagon releases 911 Video

Hi Again,

Breaking news as of '2006 May may 16 9:59 p.m. New York
AP -
1 hour, 5 minutes ago

I saw this on Yahoo News and while this link is valid, I don't know how long it will stay.

WASHINGTON - The Pentagon on Tuesday released the first video images of American Airlines Flight 77 crashing into the military headquarters building and killing 189 people in the Sept. 11, 2001 terrorist attacks. The images, recorded by Pentagon security cameras outside the building, were made public in response to a December 2004 Freedom of Information Act request by Judicial Watch, a public interest group. Some still images from the video had previously been leaked and publicly circulated, but this was the first official release.

I don't feel the video of the "plane" crashing into the pentagon answers any questions, but it sure does raise more doubts and questions. Another take on this story is from the Times online


Monday, April 10, 2006

911-7 Cover-Up "Smoke & Mirrors"

Hi everyone,

I originally started this 911 Cover-up (Smoke & Mirrors) blog on Saysame (My Blog) . I wanted to expand the topic so I decided to make this Data & Photo Blog. I downloaded numerous pictures from various sites on the web and in my haste and excitement I forgot to identify the websites that I got them from. So to all those that took the pictures and posted them I want to say thank you.

Another thing that I did in my haste and ignorance was that I downloaded the pictures to this site in the order that I wanted to present them but I didn't realize that they would be published in the reverse order. So if you want to see them the way I had them organized, start from the bottom and work your way to the top.

The bottom part of this post is a basically the same as my original post on the topic of the Great American ***911*** Cover-Up so that you don't have to link to it.

The following is similar to my original post on the other Blog:

Hi Everyone,

I've known about the 911 cover-up since I first saw it unfold on TV and saw the first and only videos from the Pentagon. The truth is far more unbelievable that the denials presented as truth. I've discussed it with several people who are all over the place as to what really happened. I've never really tried to find any web info on it as I've never had the opportunity or desire at the time, but last night I stumbled on a site and WOW, the pictures speak volumes. You have to see it.

For those that are interested, the link is at ThePowerHour and although it's called The Power Hour and has nothing to do with the religion and the The Hour of Power or something like that.

One thing that I have to mention here is that when you look at the videos and pictures of the Pentagon that were supposedly hit by a 757 commercial jet, this site implies that there was the possibility of a missile being involved. I suggest you go one step further, to the possibility of a damaged UFO crashing into the pentagon and all that that implies??

How the UFO was damaged has to do with the third plane that supposedly went down in a field in Penn. by the way with little or no wreckage, bodies or baggage, just a crater that marks the spot and burnt trees. How and by what means were they damaged, Starwars technology maybe? But why would "they" (the US Government & Military) shoot down a commercial Jet? Were the hijackers overpowered, and if so, what would that mean? If, as others believe, it was a missile that hit the Pentagon, then why did it not explode (That's what missiles do) and why did the Government lie and say it was a plane? Why would a UFO be going to the Pentagon? And Hey! If a UFO or missile did crash into the Pentagon, then where is the fourth plane, the one that supposedly crashed into the Pentagon. Humm??? Got you thinking now...

"Food for thought"

PS: I guess the US government and US military will be checking out my site more often than usual now that I'm speaking the unspeakable. BUT HEY, Bush! Isn't that what free speech and the democracy that you're supporting all about? Or is that a lie too?

911-6 The 911 Time line

The following 911 time line is copied “in part” from the following site:

September 11, 2001—Timeline for the Day of the Attacks
Department of Defense (6/1/01) and FAA (7/12/01) procedure: In the event of a
hijacking, the FAA hijack coordinator on duty at Washington headquarters requests the military to provide escort aircraft. Normally, NORAD escort aircraft take the required action. The FAA notifies the National Military Command Center by the most expeditious means. [DOD/, 6/1/01, FAA, 7/12/01, FAA 7/12/01]
If NORAD (North American Aerospace Defense Command) hears of any difficulties in the skies, they begin the work to scramble jet fighters [take off and intercept aircraft that are off course]. Between Sep 2000 and June 2001 fighters were scrambled 67 times. [AP, 8/12/02] When the Lear jet of golfer Payne Stewart didn’t respond in 1999, F-16 interceptors were quickly dispatched. According to an Air Force timeline, a series of military planes provided an emergency escort to Payne’s stricken Lear about 20 minutes after ground controllers lost contact with his plane.[Dallas Morning News, 10/26/99, more]

8:20 AM (approx.): Air traffic controllers suspect Flight 11 has been hijacked. [NY Times, 9/15/01 , more]

8:40 AM: NORAD is notified of hijacking. [NY Times, 10/16/01, 8:38 AM Washington Post, 9/15/01]

8:46 AM: Flight 11 crashes into the WTC (World Trade Center) north tower. [approximately 26 minutes after controllers lost contact][New York Times, 9/12/01]

8:46 AM: Bush later states, "I was sitting outside the classroom and I saw an airplane hit the tower. The TV was on.” [CNN, 12/4/01] “When we walked into the classroom, I had seen this plane fly into the first building.” [White House, 1/5/02] There was no live coverage of the first crash on TV.

8:52 AM: Two F-15s take off from Otis Air Force Base. [Washington Post, 9/15/01] They go after Flight 175. Major General Paul Weaver, director of the Air National Guard, states "the pilots flew like a scalded ape, topping 500 mph but were unable to catch up to the airliner. We had a nine-minute window, and in excess of 100 miles to intercept 175,'' he said. ''There was just literally no way.'' [Dallas Morning News, 9/15/01] F-15's fly at up to 2.5 times the speed of sound [1875 mph or 30+ miles a minute or 270+ miles in nine minutes] and are designed for low-altitude, high-speed, precision attacks. [BBC]

8:56 AM: By this time, it is evident that Flight 77 is lost. The FAA, already in contact with the Pentagon about the two hijackings out of Boston, reportedly doesn’t notify NORAD of this until 9:24, 28 minutes later. [see 9:10 AM for comparison, New York Times, 10/16/01]

9:03 AM: Flight 175 crashes into the south WTC tower. [23 minutes after NORAD notified, 43 minutes after air traffic control lost contact with pilots][New York Times, 9/12/01, CNN, 9/12/01]

9:10 AM: Major General Paul Weaver states Flight 77 came back on the (radar) scope at

9:10 in West Virginia. [Dallas Morning News, 9/15/01] Another report states the military was notified of Flight 77 several minutes after 9:03. [Washington Post, 9/15/01]

9:24 AM [? – see above]: The FAA, who 28 minutes earlier had discovered Flight 77 off course and heading east over West Virginia, reportedly notifies NORAD. A Pentagon spokesman says, "The Pentagon was simply not aware that this aircraft was coming our way." [Newsday, 9/23/01, New York Times, 10/16/01] Yet since the first crash, military officials in a Pentagon command center were urgently talking to law enforcement and air traffic control officials about what to do. [New York Times, 9/15/01]

9:28 AM: Air traffic control learns that Flight 93 has been hijacked. [MSNBC, 7/30/02]

9:38 AM: Flight 77 crashes into the Pentagon. [42 minutes or more after contact was lost, one hour after NORAD notification of first hijacking][New York Times, 10/16/01,

9:43 CNN, 9/12/01]

9:59 AM: The south tower of the World Trade Center collapses. [New York Times, 9/12/01]

10:10 AM: Flight 93 crashes in Pennsylvania. [42 minutes after contact was lost][CNN, 9/12/02]

10:28 AM: The World Trade Center north tower collapses. [CNN, 9/12/01, NY Times, 9/12/01]

5:20 PM: Building 7 of the World Trade Center collapses. [CNN, 9/12/01]
Sep 11, 2001: Did the Air Force send up planes after the hijacked aircraft? The Air Force won't say. It says they keep about 20 F-15 and F-16 fighters on duty with Air National Guards along the nation's coastline, ready to inspect unknown aircraft entering U.S. airspace. "We can scramble and be airborne in a matter of minutes," said an Air Force spokesperson. Some airline pilots are wondering whether the FAA did enough to try to prevent the crashes. [Wall Street Journal, 09/14/01]

Sep 11, 2001: Six air traffic controllers who dealt with two of the hijacked airliners make a tape recording describing the events, but the tape is later destroyed by a supervisor without anyone making a transcript or even listening to it. [Washington Post, 5/6/04, New York Times, 5/6/04]

Sep 11, 2001: Hours after the attacks, a "shadow government" is formed. Key congressional leaders say they didn’t know President Bush had established this government-in-waiting. Some Congressmen state the administration should have conferred about its plans. [CBS, 3/2/02, Washington Post, 3/2/02, more]

Sep 11, 2001: A National Public Radio correspondent states: "I spoke with Congressman Ike Skelton who said that just recently the director of the CIA warned that there could be an attack – an imminent attack – on the United States of this nature. So this is not entirely unexpected." [NPR, 911/01]

Sep 12, 2001: Senator Orrin Hatch says the US was monitoring bin Laden supporters and overheard them discussing the attack. [AP, 9/12/01] Why has the media not explored the fact that the US could monitor private communications of al-Qaeda on 911?

Sep 13-19, 2001: Members of bin Laden's family are driven or flown under FBI supervision to a secret assembly point in Texas and then to Washington, where they leave the country on a private plane when airports reopen three days after the attacks. [NY Times, 9/30/01, Boston Globe, 9/20/01, more]

Sep 14, 2001: The two black boxes for Flight 77 are found. [PBS, 9/14/01] FBI Director Robert Mueller later says Flight 77's data recorder provides altitude, speed, headings and other information, but the voice recorder contains “nothing useful.” [CBS, 2/23/02]

Sept 15-16, 2001: U.S. military sources give the FBI information that several of the 9/11 hijackers, including leader Mohamed Atta, may have received training at U.S. military installations. Three hijackers listed their address on drivers licenses and car registrations as the Naval Air Station in Pensacola, Fla. Atta graduated from the US International Officers School at Maxwell Air Force Base, Alabama. The media drops the story after the Air Force issues a statement saying that while the names are similar, "we are probably not talking about the same people." Yet the military provides no information to refute any of the many, detailed claims in these articles. [Newsweek, 9/15/01, Washington Post, 9/16/01, New York Times, 9/15/01, more]

Sep 19, 2001: The FBI claims that there may have been six hijacking teams on the morning of 911. [New York Times, 9/19/01, CBS, 9/14/01] Authorities have identified teams that total as many as 50 infiltrators who supported or carried out the strikes. About 40 of the men have been accounted for. [Los Angeles Times, 9/13/01] Yet only one person, Moussaoui, is later charged.

Sept 23, 2001: Several of the alleged 9/11 hijackers are still alive. Pilot Waleed Al Shehri is one of the men the FBI said crashed a plane into the WTC. He is protesting his innocence from Morocco. His photograph was released, and he acknowledges that he is indeed the Waleed Al Shehri named by the FBI. But, he says, he left the US last year and became a pilot with Saudi Arabian airlines. Yet Al Shehri and others who turned up alive are later listed as hijackers in the 2004 9/11 Commission Report. [BBC, 9/23/01, more]

Oct 2, 2001: The Patriot Act is introduced in Congress. The next day, Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Patrick Leahy (D) accuses the Bush administration of reneging on an agreement on this anti-terrorist bill. [Washington Post, 10/4/01] Anthrax letters are sent to Leahy and Senate Majority Leader Tom Daschle (D) on October 9. [CNN, 11/18/01]

911-5 Investigation & Simulation Photos

This plane did this amount of damage in an aborted take-off, not one that was still flying at over 400 mph

Look at the damage that the wings did as the plane hit the tower with the same force as the one that supposedly hit the Pentagon

Note the size and the height of a 757 at ground level and compare it to the damage made to the upper floors

Note that there is little damage to the upper floors and that the cable spools from the recent reno are basically untouched because there is no plane wreckage

This photo shows the trajectory of the object and the insert photo shows the exit hole.

Note: There is no namage to the "pitched" top part of the pentagon roof

There is no damage(explosion or fire)to the inner square

Wings should have damaged the Pentagon and left wreckage
Note: cable spools in other photos, not move, damaged or burned

Flight path of plane or "object"

911-4 Official Security Videos & Street Light Photos